大學(xué)生如何規(guī)劃用錢(qián)英語(yǔ)作文
住宿之后的大學(xué)生，規(guī)劃用錢(qián)是必要的，方法可以參考相關(guān)的英語(yǔ)作文。下面是學(xué)習(xí)啦小編給大家整理的大學(xué)生用錢(qián)規(guī)劃英語(yǔ)作文，供大家參閱!
大學(xué)生如何規(guī)劃用錢(qián)英語(yǔ)作文篇1
Many students spend money in a quite extravagant way. They see things they like and they must have them, no matter how expensive: clothes, jewelry, shoes, facials, hair and nails for girls; clothes, watches, shoes and electronics for guys. It seems that many students reach university and go a little wild with all the freedom after the stress of high school.
There are two differing opinions about this phenomenon. Some feel that it is fine for students to have a little fun; after all, they can only enjoy their lives in college, since after graduation, there will be nothing but work, work, and more work. Others, however, frown on the extravagance; college is, they point out, the period when people form habits of independent living, since it is probably the first time that most children have been somewhat independent from parents.
In my opinion, we college students need to have some restraint in our spending habits. Most of us are still financially dependent on parents, but we are preparing for independence very soon. If we get used to spending extravagantly now, the adjustment to adult life will be extremely difficult.
許多大學(xué)生花錢(qián)大手大腳。他們看到自己喜歡的東西，他們就想擁有，無(wú)論多么昂貴的衣服，首飾，鞋，美容，女孩子的頭發(fā)和指甲;衣服，手表，鞋子和電子產(chǎn)品等等。似乎很多學(xué)生度過(guò)了高中的壓力到了大學(xué)后會(huì)野一點(diǎn)。
有兩種不同意見(jiàn)的這種現(xiàn)象。有些人認(rèn)為，學(xué)生有一點(diǎn)樂(lè)趣，這是好的;畢竟，他們只能享受他們?cè)诖髮W(xué)的生活，自從畢業(yè)后，只會(huì)有工作，工作，和更多的工作。其他人，然而，不鋪張浪費(fèi);大學(xué)，他們指出，這時(shí)期的人們形成獨(dú)立的生活習(xí)慣，因?yàn)樗赡苁谴蠖鄶?shù)孩子第一次離開(kāi)父母有獨(dú)立的生活。
在我看來(lái)，大學(xué)生的消費(fèi)習(xí)慣需要有一些限制。我們中的大多數(shù)人仍然在經(jīng)濟(jì)上依賴(lài)父母，但我們準(zhǔn)備不久后獨(dú)立。如果我們習(xí)慣于花費(fèi)奢侈的現(xiàn)在，調(diào)整到成人的生活將是非常困難的。
大學(xué)生如何規(guī)劃用錢(qián)英語(yǔ)作文篇2
after three's years busy learning life in senior high school,finally i have been a new one of college students and now i najor in mechanical design and manufacturing that i would like to study ,the three years in college school is the most important time in all life,it 's the key to future,so i think it's necessary to plan ahead
firstly,making good use of three years in school ,i would like to make my all kinds of ability and hobbies develope to full,i like reading ,writing ,basketball,especially studing investing in stocks,these interests will help me into a colourful life .second,i will study hard in my every major and widen my horizon and expand my knowledge to shoulder the responsibilit of building my country,last but not least ,i will improve my communicative ability and interpersonal relationship,because after graduation,i'm ready to start my new business ,so i have to develop this ability ,in short,i will try my best to spend a wonderful time in college
大學(xué)生如何規(guī)劃用錢(qián)英語(yǔ)作文篇3
I agree with the speaker's broad assertion that money spent on research is generally money well invested. However, the speaker unnecessarily extends this broad assertion to embrace research whose results are "controversial," while ignoring certain compelling reasons why some types of research might be unjustifiable.
My points of contention with the speaker are the fundamental objectives and nature of research, as discussed below. I concede that the speaker is on the correct philosophical side of this issue.
After all, research is of the unknown for true answers to our questions, and for lasting solutions to our enduring problems. Research is also the chief means by which we humans to satisfy our insatiable appetite for knowledge, and our craving to understand ourselves and the world around us.
Yet, in the very notion of research also lies my first point of contention with the speaker, who illogically presumes that we can know the results of research before we invest in it. To the contrary, if research is to be of any value it must explore uncharted and In fact, query whether research whose benefits are and predictable can break any new ground, or whether it can be considered "research" at all.
While we must invest in research of whether the might be controversial, at the same time we should be circumspect about research whose objectives are too and whose potential benefits are too speculative. After all, expensive research always carries significant opportunity costs--in terms of how the money might be spent toward addressing society's more immediate problems that do not require research.
One apt illustration of this point involves the so-called "Star Wars" defense initiative, championed by the Reagan administration during the 1980s, this initiative was ill-conceived and largely a waste of taxpayer dollars; and few would dispute that the exorbitant amount of money devoted to the initiative could have gone a long way toward addressing pressing social problems of the day--by establishing after-school programs for by AIDS awareness and education, and so forth.
As it turns out, at the end of the Star Wars debacle we were left with gang violence, an AIDS epidemic, and an unprecedented federal budget deficit. The speaker's assertion is troubling in two other respects as well. First, no amount of research can completely solve the enduring problems of war, poverty, and violence, for the reason that they certain aspects of human nature--such as aggression and greed. Although human genome research might eventually enable us to engineer away those undesirable aspects of our nature, in the meantime it is up to our economists, diplomats, social reformers, and jurists--not our research laboratories--to these problems.
Secondly, for every new research breakthrough that helps reduces human suffering is another that serves primarily to add to that suffering. For example, while some might argue that physics researchers who harnessed the power of the atom have provided us with an source of energy and invaluable "peace-keepers," this argument flies in the face of the hundreds of thousands of innocent people murdered and maimed by atomic blasts, and by nuclear meltdowns. And, in fulfilling the promise of "better living through chemistry" research has given us chemical weapons for human slaughter. In short, so-called "advances" that scientific research has brought about often net for humanity. In sum, the speaker's assertion that we should invest in research whose results are "controversial" begs the question, because we cannot know whether research will turn out controversial until we've invested in it. As for the speaker's broader assertion, I agree that money spent on research is generally a sound investment because it is an investment in the advancement of human knowledge and in human imagination and spirit.
Nevertheless, when we do research purely for its own sake without aim or clear purpose--we risk resources which could have been applied to relieve the immediate of our dispirited and disenfranchised members of society. In the final analysis, given finiteeconomic resources we are forced to strike a balance in how we those resources among societal objectives.
我同意該發(fā)言者的廣泛主張，即錢(qián)花在研究上的錢(qián)一般都是投資的。然而，說(shuō)話(huà)人不必要的延伸這一廣泛的說(shuō)法抱著研究的結(jié)果是“有爭(zhēng)議的，”而忽略了某些令人信服的理由，為什么一些研究類(lèi)型可能是不合理的。
我的論點(diǎn)與演講者的基本目標(biāo)和性質(zhì)的研究，如下面所討論。我承認(rèn)，演講者是正確的哲學(xué)方面的問(wèn)題。
畢竟，研究是未知的，對(duì)我們的問(wèn)題的真正答案，并為我們的持久問(wèn)題的持久解決方案。研究的主要手段，也是我們?nèi)祟?lèi)來(lái)滿(mǎn)足我們對(duì)知識(shí)永不滿(mǎn)足的食欲，我們渴望了解我們自己和我們周?chē)氖澜纭?/p>
然而，在研究觀念也在于我的第一個(gè)論點(diǎn)與揚(yáng)聲器，誰(shuí)不認(rèn)為我們可以在投資前我們知道研究的結(jié)果。以相反，如果研究是對(duì)被任何有價(jià)值的它必須探索未知的，事實(shí)上，查詢(xún)是否研究的好處和預(yù)測(cè)可以打破新的地面，或它是否可以被認(rèn)為是“研究”。
而我們必須投資是否可能有爭(zhēng)議的研究，同時(shí)我們應(yīng)慎重研究目標(biāo)是否和其潛在好處太投機(jī)。畢竟，昂貴的研究總是帶來(lái)巨大的機(jī)會(huì)成本，即如何把錢(qián)花在解決社會(huì)更直接的問(wèn)題上，而不需要研究。一個(gè)容易說(shuō)明這一點(diǎn)涉及到所謂的“星球大戰(zhàn)”主動(dòng)防御，倡導(dǎo)的里根政府在20世紀(jì)80年代，這一舉措是拙劣的，很大程度上是一種浪費(fèi)納稅人的錢(qián);，很少有人會(huì)爭(zhēng)議，錢(qián)致力于主動(dòng)量過(guò)高會(huì)有走了漫長(zhǎng)的道路，朝著解決緊迫的社會(huì)問(wèn)題的一天——通過(guò)建立課后計(jì)劃的艾滋病宣傳教育，等等。
事實(shí)證明，在星球大戰(zhàn)的慘敗，最后我們留下的幫派暴力，艾滋病的流行，以及前所未有的聯(lián)邦預(yù)算赤字。演講者的主張?jiān)谄渌矫娑际橇钊瞬话驳?。首先，沒(méi)有研究能徹底解決戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)、貧窮和暴力的持久問(wèn)題，因?yàn)樗麄兡承┓矫娴娜诵?，如侵略和貪婪。雖然人類(lèi)基因組研究可能最終使我們工程師遠(yuǎn)離那些不良的方面，我們的本性，同時(shí)它是我們的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家，外交官，社會(huì)改革者，和法學(xué)家——不是我們研究實(shí)驗(yàn)室——這些問(wèn)題。
其次，每一個(gè)新的研究突破，有助于減少人類(lèi)的痛苦是另一個(gè)主要是為了增加痛苦。為例，雖然有些人可能會(huì)認(rèn)為，物理學(xué)的研究人員誰(shuí)駕馭原子的力量為我們提供能源和寶貴的“和平守護(hù)者的一個(gè)源泉，”這一論點(diǎn)蒼蠅面對(duì)數(shù)百成千上萬(wàn)無(wú)辜的人被殺害，致殘的原子彈爆炸，核熔毀。而且，在履行“更好的生活，通過(guò)化學(xué)”的承諾，研究已經(jīng)給了我們?nèi)祟?lèi)的化學(xué)武器。簡(jiǎn)而言之，所謂的“進(jìn)步”，科學(xué)研究帶來(lái)的往往是人類(lèi)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)。
總之，演講者的主張，我們應(yīng)該投資于研究，其結(jié)果是“有爭(zhēng)議的”引出的問(wèn)題，因?yàn)槲覀儾恢朗欠裱芯繒?huì)變成爭(zhēng)議，直到我們已經(jīng)投資了。至于演講者的更廣泛的主張，我同意，花在研究上的錢(qián)通常是一種穩(wěn)健的投資，因?yàn)樗且环N對(duì)人類(lèi)知識(shí)的進(jìn)步和人類(lèi)的想象和精神的投資。然而，當(dāng)我們做研究的時(shí)候純粹是因?yàn)樗鼪](méi)有目標(biāo)或目的明確自己——我們的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)可以被應(yīng)用于緩解我們的沮喪和被剝奪權(quán)利的社會(huì)成員的直接資源。在最后的分析中，我們不得不找到一個(gè)平衡點(diǎn)在我們這些資源在社會(huì)目標(biāo)。
看過(guò)大學(xué)生用錢(qián)規(guī)劃英語(yǔ)作文的人還看了：
1.關(guān)于大學(xué)生消費(fèi)觀念的英語(yǔ)作文
2.大學(xué)如何合理安排時(shí)間英語(yǔ)作文
大學(xué)生如何規(guī)劃用錢(qián)英語(yǔ)作文
